Discussion as a Way of Teaching
Discussion
as a Way of Teaching
Section 2 of “Discussion as a Way
of Teaching,” by Stephen Brookfield, prompts teachers to ask students to recall
the most and least successful discussions they have been involved in. This also
prompts readers to do the same while reading the rest of the article. For me,
the most successful conversations I have been involved in, specifically in
school, were Socratic seminars in my senior year English class. Factors that
made these conversations so effective included a welcoming classroom
environment, students that chose to be in the class (as it was for college
credit and optional), and my personal motivation to read and actually engage in
the conversation.
Throughout Brookfield’s article, I reflected
on these seminars and ways in which his suggested practices could or could not
be applied to a large group conversation of the sort. I also imagined the strategies
applied to small group discussions and one-on-one discussions with students. One
strategy that I particularly enjoyed was given in the section titled “Conversational
Moves.” The strategy suggested supplying students with an action that they are
to complete during the discussion. For example, “make a comment that
underscores the link between two people's contributions” (page 7). I think this
strategy could be useful and interesting to use during large group
conversations, especially if these moves were given to students who are less
inclined to participate in conversations. Rather than just requiring all
students to speak, these moves would prompt a specific action from students.
Another one of Brookfield’s suggestion that stuck out to me was the “Conversational
Roles” section. The strategy suggests that students are given a role such as
Devil’s advocate or Umpire, and it is their job to listen and respond to the
conversation according to their job description. For example, the Umpire would
be listening for insulting or judgmental comments and regulating the ground
rules of the conversation for other members. I think that this strategy would
be useful in small group conversations where the discussion is more intimate and
students would be more willing to share their concerns and ideas.
On page 10, Brookfield says “mandating
speech seems like an exercise of teacher power that stands in direct contrast
to the spirit of demographic conversation.” I agree entirely with this idea,
but believe that it is the responsibility of the teacher to encourage and
inspire involvement with class discussions. I believe the strategies that
Brookfield described will help me do so in a creative and supportive way.
Comments
Post a Comment